Legal Opinion

Holzman v. Fiola Blum, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 2, 1999No. 570, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

This appeal arises from an action instituted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County by Fióla Blum, Inc. (“Blum” or the “Broker”), appellee and cross-appellant, against Allen Bruce Holzman and his wife, Terry Lee Holzman (the “Holz-mans” or the “Sellers”), appellants and cross-appellees. Blum sought to recover a real estate broker’s commission allegedly owed pursuant to a Listing Agreement executed by the parties for the sale of appellants’ residence. Following a bench trial, the court found appellants liable to the Broker for a commis sion of $37,600. In addition, the…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Kaiser v. MEPC American Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sass v. AndrewCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Mitchell v. AARP Life Insurance ProgramCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. B & P ENTERPRISES v. Overland Equipment Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API