Legal Opinion

Newman v. Reilly

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 12, 1988No. 24, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The plaintiff in this tort action was involuntarily committed to a mental disorder treatment facility on the certificate of two physicians and was released following the first admission hearing at the facility. Plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that the defendant, one of the certifying physicians, had not followed statutorily mandated procedures for an involuntary commitment. The merits of that contention turned on a relatively narrow question of statutory construction which was obscured, if not buried, by the layers of legal papers filed in proceedings in health claims…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Dent v. SimmonsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Bailey v. WoelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Legal Aid Bureau, Inc. v. Bishop's Garth Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Walzer v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Breslin v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. B & K Rentals & Sales Co. v. Universal Leaf Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. DiLeo v. NugentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API