Legal Opinion
West Point Manufacturing Co. v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 10, 1955No. 5 Div. 626PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
This controversy arose under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and was begun by a verified complaint as authorized by section 304, Title 26, Code. There was a judgment for plaintiff and defendant has brought it here by certiorari as authorized.
The issues were made by the verified complaint and verified answer to it. There was no occasion to prove the allegations of the complaint which were admitted in the answer. The judgment “shall contain a statement of the law and facts and conclusions as determined by said judge”. The foregoing is provided for in section 304, supra. The finding is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Bryant v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Malbis Bakery Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- BF Goodrich Company v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Head v. Triangle Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Harbin v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- United Telephone and Telegraph Company v. CuliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- DALE MOTELS, INCORPORATED v. CrittendenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.