Legal Opinion

United Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Culiver

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 12, 1961No. 4 Div. 31PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Chapter 5, Title 26, Code 1940, as amended) by Sherman Culiver against United Telephone and Telegraph Company, a corporation. From a judgment awarding compensation the employer Telephone Company has obtained review by certiorari.

“Accident” is defined in our Workmen’s Compensation Law to mean “an unexpected or unforeseen event, happening suddenly and violently, with or without human fault, and producing at the time injury to the physical structure of the body, by accidental means.” § 262(i), Title 26, Code 1940.

The evidence for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. New River Coal Co. v. FilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Southern Cotton Oil Company v. WynnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. SCI ALABAMA FUNERAL SERVICES v. HesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Blackmon v. R.L. Zeigler Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Pinkney v. James B. Clow & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. BUCHANAN LUMBER CO., INC. v. EdwardsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API