Harbin v. United States Steel Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
United States Steel Corporation petitions this court for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review a judgment rendered by the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County awarding respondent, Bobby E. Harbin, benefits under the Alabama Workmen's Compensation Act.
U.S. Steel contends that the judgment of the trial court was in error on three grounds. First, U.S. Steel submits that the judgment rendered by the trial court made no finding on whether or not Harbin notified U.S. Steel (or its agents) that he (Harbin) had been injured. Next, U.S. Steel argues that there was no evidence to support the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- BF Goodrich Company v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Tombrello Coal Co. v. FortenberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Richardson Lumber Co. v. PoundersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Bass v. Cowikee MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Thompson and Co. Contractors v. ColeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Littleton v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Thomas v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Dun & Bradstreet Corp. v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Farris v. St. Vincent's Hosp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.