Legal Opinion

State v. Barlow

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 12, 1993No. 10944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.

The defendant, Richard Barlow, appeals from a judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a) (l).1 The defendant claims (1) that the trial court, Sferrazza, J., improperly denied a motion in limine that sought to preclude litigation of an issue previously addressed in an administrative decision, and (2) that the trial court, McWeeney, J., improperly denied a subsequent motion in limine, permitting the state to introduce certain evidence.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. State v. FritzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. State v. HarrisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Janes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. State v. O'ROURKECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API