Legal Opinion
Fiddelman v. Redmon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 4, 1993No. 10798PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
In this dissolution of marriage action, the plaintiff appeals and the defendant cross appeals from various orders of the trial court. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly entered orders regarding (1) the disposition of the marital home and (2) an allegedly indefinite custody arrangement.1 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied her motion to open and set aside the judgment as it pertains to custody and visitation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.2
*203The parties to this appeal were married on July 2, 1984. They have two children, born in 1986 and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Wasko v. FarleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.