Legal Opinion

Janes v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 26, 1998No. 104, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

The issue before us is collateral estoppel—whether the State is precluded from prosecuting appellant, Vincent Janes, for driving while intoxicated and other related offenses because, in an earlier proceeding before the Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA), conducted to determine whether Janes’s driver’s license should be suspended by reason' of his refusal to take a breath test, an administrative law judge determined that Janes was not driving the vehicle. We shall hold that the State is not precluded from proceeding with the criminal case.

RELEVANT STATUTORY FRAMEWORK

There are…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Standard Fire Insurance v. BerrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. R & D 2001, LLC v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Motor Vehicle Administration v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Motor Vehicle Administration v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API