Legal Opinion
State v. Fritz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 23, 1987No. 12636PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in restricting the scope of questioning during the voir dire examination of the potential-jurors. By substitute information, the defendant, Harvey Fritz, a licensed physician specializing in internal medicine and cardiology, was charged with prescribing a controlled substance to another person in a manner not authorized by chapter 417 of the General Statutes, in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-277 (a)1 and *15821a-252 (a)2 (formerly chapter 359, General Statutes §§ 19-480 [a] and 19-460 [a]). Following a trial to a jury, the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Walczyk v. RioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.