Legal Opinion

Castronuovo v. Sordoni

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1986No. 2815PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

The present litigation was initiated to determine ownership of approximately 3.8 acres of unimproved land (parcel C) situated in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. Parcel C shares its eastern bound with a 50' X 100' rectangular lot (parcel B) and a 76/ioo acre triangular plot of land (parcel A). See Appendix. It is undisputed that parcels A and B are owned and occupied by John and Hazel 1 Castronuovo.

This appeal is before our court from the verdict of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County granting Hazel and John Castronuovo quiet title to parcel C by adverse possession.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Piccinini v. Teachers Protective Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Stark Et Ux. v. Lardin, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Smith v. PetermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sutton v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Moore v. DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Baylor v. SoskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Wittig v. CarlacciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API