Baylor v. Soska
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
On May 4, 1988, Robert and Lillian Baylor filed a quiet title action with respect to a parcel of land upon which a garden, hedges and a garage were located. The Baylors claim title to this parcel of land by adverse possession. Mrs. Soska, appellant herein, asserts that the adverse possession claim is defective and that the land in question belongs to her. She requests, by way of counterclaim, that the Baylors’ garage be removed from this parcel of land.
The evidence indicates that Mary Hanecak, Baylors’ predecessor in title, purchased the land in 1942.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Stark Et Ux. v. Lardin, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Tioga Coal Co. v. Supermarkets General Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Scheetz v. FitzwaterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
- Masters v. Local No. 472, U.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Moore v. DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Flannery v. StumpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Zeglin v. GahagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Johnson v. Tele-Media Co. of McKean CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.