Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Miller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1991No. 746PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

Appeal is taken from a final decree in Equity awarding appellees, through adverse possession, fee simple title to a parcel of land adjoining appellants’ lot. In addition, appellees received mandatory injunctive relief compelling appellants to replace appellees’ fence (previously removed by appellants) at a location where it had remained from 1957-1985. With modification, we affirm.

The relevant facts as found below by the Honorable George Kiester, S.J., specially presiding, are as follows:

Appellees, Edward Delos, et ux., are the current owners of a parcel of land located in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Weiss v. EquibankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. BALSBAUGH v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Kalyvas v. KalyvasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. Infertility Center of America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Siskos v. BritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Plauchak v. BolingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Moore v. DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Flannery v. StumpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API