Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n & Isbrandtsen Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalter E. Hart, J.
The petitioning union moves for an order directing Isbrandtsen Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the Company) to submit a purported dispute between the parties to arbitration. The Company cross-moves for an order staying arbitration.
By the contract between the parties entered into on October 2,1961 it was agreed inter alia:
“ Section 12, severance
“ 1) The Company agrees that incorporated in this section are the provisions for the Mitchell Shipman award for Severance Pay for Engineers who have lost their positions by reason of the sale or transfer of the vessel on which they were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- St. Pierre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Johnson v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greater Missoula Area Federation of Early Childhood Educators & Related Personnel v. Child Start, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Greater Missoula Area Federation of Early Childhood Educators & Related Personnel v. Child Start, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Greater Missoula v. Child Start IMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Greater Missoula v. Child Start IMontana Supreme Court · 2009