Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Chrust
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 2004No. 01 Civ.10080(RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Steven Chrust (“Chrust”) renews a motion for sanctions against plaintiff Steven A. Greenberg (“Greenberg”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927. Greenberg, in turn, moves for sanctions for defending this current motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(c)(1)(A).
For the reasons set forth below, both Chrust’s and Greenberg’s motions for sanctions are denied.
Prior Proceedings
This action was commenced on November 14, 2001, by the filing of a complaint alleging causes of action for (1) common law fraud; (2) securities fraud; (3) negligent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Simon Debartolo Group, L.P., Gordon Altman Butowsky Weitzen Shalov & Wein v. The Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc., and New England Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Seyed N. Shafii v. British Airways, PlcCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Rommy Revson, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, Judd Burstein v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dujardin v. Liberty Media Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Shu Lun Wu v. May Kwan Si, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- A.L.M. v. Board of Managers of the Vireum Schoolhouse CondominiumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Mourabit v. KleinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Schusterman v. MazzoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019