Legal Opinion

Alexander v. McKnight

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1992No. D014801PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, Acting P. J.

The source of the underlying litigation in this case is a neighborhood dispute between plaintiffs Elaine M. and D. Steven Alexander and four other couples who live either adjacent to or across the street from the defendants Mary and William H. McKnight. In a nonjury trial the court determined the conduct of the McKnights warranted granting the plaintiffs equitable relief and damages of $28,000. The McKnights appeal only that part of the monetary award, $24,000, reflecting the court’s finding that the McKnights’ behavior caused the value of plaintiffs’ houses to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Reed v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Salma v. CaponCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Bartleson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Sweat v. HollisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. STRAWN EX REL. STRAWN v. CanusoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  5. Shapiro v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API