Legal Opinion

Moelering v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1893No. 870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReiniiakd, J.

Smith instituted this action against the Diamond Match Company, as^ sole defendant, for the enforcement of a mechanic’s and material man’s lien, alleging in his complaint that he had performed labor and furnished materials in the construction of certain buildings on said company’s lands in Wabash county, Indiana, to one William Moelering, who had a contract with said company for the construction of said buildings.

Upon his own application, the appellant, the said William Moelering, was admitted as a party defendant.

Thereupon appellee Smith filed his amended complaint in two paragraphs,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coffin v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Dailey v. State ex rel. CourtneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Brookbank v. State ex rel. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Logansport & Pleasant Grove Turnpike Co. v. HeilIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ramey v. State ex rel. StrykerIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Bader v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Steele v. Michigan Buggy Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Hitz v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Beard v. DoddIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API