Legal Opinion

Ramey v. State ex rel. Stryker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1891No. 14,792PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, C. J.

This is a prosecution by the appellee against the appellant for bastardy.

But two questions are presented for which a reversal of the judgment is asked. First, for the reason that the relatrix was permitted to testify, over the objection of appellant, that she had had sexual intercourse with appellant at other times than that which she claims resulted in pregnacy. *244Second, that relatrix’s witnesses were permitted to testify as to statements made by relatrix out of court previous to the trial and in the absence of appellant, as to the paternity of the child.

As to the first question, the relatrix…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Brookbank v. State ex rel. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Houser v. State ex rel. LantzIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Carter v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Dodd v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lefforge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State v. LowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Gemmill v. State ex rel. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Moelering v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Gooding v. State ex rel. McGillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API