Legal Opinion

Logansport & Pleasant Grove Turnpike Co. v. Heil

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1889No. 13,423PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellee testified that one of the wheels of the wagon in which he was riding ran into a deep hole in the turnpike of the appellant upon which he was. driving; that the wagon was upset and he was thrown out and injured. One of the witnesses for the appellant testified that the appellee told him that he had upset his wagon by making “ too short a turn,” and others testified that he told them that he upset the wagon by “ running one of the wheels against a large stone.” In reply the appellee introduced evidence of statements made by himself the day after the accident occurred corresponding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Coffin v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Blossom v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Hodges v. BalesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Denman v. McMahinIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. State v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Garr, Scott & Co. v. ShafferIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gallion & Gregory v. WinfreeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Moelering v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API