Legal Opinion

Dailey v. State ex rel. Courtney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1867PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from Switzerland Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

— This was a prosecution for bastardy. On the cross-examination of the prosecuting witness, she answered that she did not tell Mrs. Dyer, in May, 1865, “that I (she) had been too much with men,” or, “that I (she) had been acting bad with men.” She stated, also, that she did not tell John Henry, in the spring of 1865, that she “had beén acting bad with men.” On behalf of the defendant, Mrs. Dyer testified that a few days before the child was born, the prosecuting witness told her that she “ had been too much with men.”

The State proved, over the exception of the defendant, by several witnesses,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coffin v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hobbs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Glenn v. State ex rel. CloreIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. MaggardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API