Legal Opinion
Laborers Local No. 942 v. Lampkin
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1998No. S-7651, S-7662, S-7765 and S-7775PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
These consolidated appeals raise the issue of whether the Fairbanks North Star Borough’s decision to require successful bidders on a construction project to enter into a project labor agreement with local labor unions violated the Alaska Constitution and the borough’s procurement code. The superior court struck one provision of the agreement and enjoined enforcement of another under the state constitution, but upheld the remainder. We affirm in part and reverse in part, holding that no portion of the agreement violates the state constitution or the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Wilkerson v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Laverty v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.