Legal Opinion

Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. Kritz

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2000No. S-9167PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0 P I N I 0 N

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Two incorporated organizations, Alaskans for a Common Language and U.S. English, appeal the superior court's order denying their motions to intervene in a lawsuit that will determine the constitutionality of a successful ballot initiative requiring the government to use English,. Because the incorpo-rators of Alaskans for a Common Language were also the sponsors on the initiative committee, and because the executive branch publicly opposed the initiative before the election, Alaskans for a Common Language was entitled to intervene under Alaska…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Keith v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 148 v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Keller v. FrenchAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API