Legal Opinion

California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1997No. 95-789PublishedCited by 735 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The State of California requires a contractor on a public works project to pay its workers the prevailing wage in the project’s locale. An exception to this requirement permits a contractor to pay a lower wage to workers participating in an approved apprenticeship program. This case presents the question whether the pre-emption provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 829, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq., supersedes California’s prevailing wage law to the extent that the law prohibits payment of an apprentice wage to an apprentice trained in an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by735 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Parrino v. FHP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2001

730 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API