Legal Opinion

Javor v. Dellinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1992No. B062235PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

We granted a petition transfering this case, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 2(a), to resolve a significant issue of law about which there seemed to be a dispute among the appellate authorities: whether the imposition of sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 (hereafter section 128.5) requires a finding that the sanctioned party was guilty of bad faith. We are satisfied that it does. That was the determination of the Appellate Department of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which correctly resolved the issue before it.

Insofar as it bears on the issue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Finnie v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Summers v. City of Cathedral CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Bach v. McNelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Winick Corp. v. County Sanitation District No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Frank Annino & Sons Construction, Inc. v. McArthur Restaurants, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Hayward Dodge, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Stell v. Jay Hales Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Dolan v. Buena Engineers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Harris v. Rudin, Richman & AppelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Talavera v. NevarezAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API