Legal Opinion

Furgason v. Bellaire

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 12, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The appellant contends that the only question presented is as to whether plaintiff’s cause of action was barred by the Statute of Limitations, because the trial court sustained the motion on that ground. Two or three other grounds besides the Statute of Limitations were raised in the motion. The record is:

“The motion is sustained. (Plaintiff excepts.) Gentlemen of the jury, the court instructs you to return a verdict for de*278fendant, on the ground that the cause of action is barred by the Statute of Limitations.”

The grounds of the motion, stated briefly, are that defendant can be held liable…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Sheldon v. WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
  3. Ogg v. RobbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Whitesell v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Gardner v. BeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Nelson v. SandellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Phillips v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Wetzel v. PiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Berg v. WillettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API