Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Briggs

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1932No. 41496PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

— It may be noted that the trial court sustained the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict upon several grounds (13 in number) among which were, inter alia:(1) That recklessness within the meaning of Section 5026-bl was not shown.(2) That no recklessness within the meaning of the statute herein cited was shown by the evidence to have been the direct and proximate cause of the injury to the plaintiff.(3) That the undisputed evidence discloses that the plaintiff went to sleep in the back seat of said car, and exercised no care for her safety, and was, therefore, guilty of contributory…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Neessen v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Cerny v. SecorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Hanna v. Central States Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nangle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Orme v. Burr Burch v. BurrSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. Thuente v. Hart MotorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Goodman v. GonseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Hebert Ex Rel. Hebert v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API