Legal Opinion
Alamo Express, Inc. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided March 20, 1965No. Civ. A. 3485PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUTTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action to set aside, annul and enjoin orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission granting authority under Section 5(2) (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5(2) (a), to CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., to acquire control of INLAND MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., through purchase of capital stock, and in turn to W. W. CALLAN, controlling stockholder of CENTRAL, by virtue of the transaction. Their main complaint is that after they had won several prior rounds before the Commission as protestants to the Defendants’ application for control, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1968
- Aberdeen and Rockfish Railroad Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- Resort Bus Lines, Inc. v. the Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
- Black Ball Freight Service v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.