Legal Opinion
Black Ball Freight Service v. United States
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 26, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 3828PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLDT, District Judge:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
American Farm Lines (AFL) made an application under the provisions of Section 210a(a) Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. Section 310a(a) 1 and Ex Parte No. MC-67, Motor Carrier Temporary Authorities, 98 M.C.C. 483, 49 C. F.R. 1131, et seq., to the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) for a Temporary Authority to provide single-line motor carrier service. The application appeared in the Federal Register June 8, 1968. The thirty-five motor carrier plaintiffs in this action, twenty-eight intervening rail carrier plaintiffs and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Inland Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Superior Trucking Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
- Munitions Carriers Conference, Inc. v. American Farm LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.