Legal Opinion
Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided June 28, 1972No. SA-71-CA-337PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge, and SUTTLE and WOOD, District Judges. SUTTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Frozen Food Express, Inc. and Zero Refrigerated Lines, Inc. filed this action to suspend, annul, enjoin and set aside two decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission). 1 This three-judge Court, convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2325, has jurisdiction of this action under 49 U.S. C. §§ 17(9), 305(g), 305(h) and 28 U.S. C. §§ 1336, 1398. The decisions of the Commission which are the subject of this action granted motor carrier authority to 16 applicants to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Transfer & Storage Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- C & H Transportation Co., Inc. And J.H. Rose Truck Line, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- O-J Transport Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and Associated Truck Lines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Delaware River Port Authority v. TiemannDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.