Legal Opinion

Estate of Harrington v. Kelly

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1905No. S.F. No. 4038PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a decree of distribution of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

John P. Harrington died testate, and his estate, was probated in the city and county of San Francisco. No mention was made in his will of Amelia Harrington, appellant herein. Upon the hearing of the executor’s petition for distribution of the estate she appeared and filed her answer to the petition, and prayed that one half of the residue of the estate be distributed to her as the widow of the deceased. All the devisees mentioned in the will, saving one, appeared and filed opposition to the claim of the appellant as the surviving widow of the deceased. The court made its decree settling the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Garwood v. GarwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Bingham v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Howell v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Quirk v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Matthews v. OrmerdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Guardianship of SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In Re Estate of HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Koutnik v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API