Legal Opinion

Brown v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WinbosNe,'J.

Appellants in challenging the action of the trial court in rendering judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants, make these valid contentions which are determinative of this appeal: First, that the arbitration agreement here involved is in accordance with procedure at common law and not with that prescribed in the Uniform Arbitration Act, G.S. 1-544, et seq., Andrews v. Jordan, 205 N. C. 618, 172 S. E. 319; Copney v. Paries, 212 N. C. 217, 193 S. E. 21; and that, hence, the motion for judgment on the pleadings must be considered in the light of the common law. Secondly, that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Andrews v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Copney v. . ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Tarpley v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Skinner v. Gaither Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Lammonds v. Aleo Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. McDonough Construction Co. of Florida v. HannerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1964
  5. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API