Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Gaither Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1951No. 309PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNhill, J.

Tbe amount to be paid to tbe plaintiff for constructing tbe building and tbe balance, if any, still due and unpaid thereon are not subject to arbitration under tbe contract! Plaintiff sues, in part, to recover an alleged balance due. In this respect, in any event, tbe complaint is sufficient to repel tbe demurrer. Mills Co. v. Shaw, Comr. of Revenue, 233 N.C. 71, and cases cited.

But defendant insists that as to tbe repair bill the arbitration provisions of tbe contract prevail and preclude plaintiff’s right to resort to the courts until after tbe arbitration is bad as agreed by tbe parties.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Piscataqua Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
  2. W. H. Blodgett Co. v. Bebe Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kelly v. Trimont Lodge, No. 249Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Williams v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Carpenter v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Shaver PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. C. P. Robinson Construction Co. v. National Corp. for Housing PartnershipsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1974
  3. Barnhart v. Civil Service Employees Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Warren Bros. v. Community Building Corp. of Atlanta, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1974
  5. Sims v. Ritter Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API