Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Starling

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 11, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEevin, J.

Courts are created to try causes. A trial is the examination before a competent tribunal, according to the law of the land, of the issues between the parties in a cause, whether they be issues of law or of fact, for the purpose of determining such issues. G.S. 1-170; Cooney v. Cooney, 25 Cal. 2d 202, 153 P. 2d 334; Finn v. Spagnoli, 67 Cal. 330, 7 P. 746; Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co., 57 Cal. 501; Breed v. Hobart, 187 Mo. 140, 86 S.W. 108; State ex rel. Carleton v. District Court of Lewis and Clark County, 33 Mont. 138, 82 P. 789, 8 Ann. Cas. 752; Kromer v. Kear, 86 Ohio App. 309,…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Ely v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API