Lammonds v. Aleo Manufacturing Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Decision here turns on whether the plaintiff is the real party in interest, within the purview of G.S. 1-57, and as such has the right to maintain this action.
The defendant insists that since the plaintiff is not a party to the collective labor contract or to the arbitration, she may not maintain the action. The defendant further contends that if any action of this type is appropriate, it must be brought by the labor union. On the other hand, the plaintiff insists that she as a third party beneficiary is entitled to sue into the contract for back pay and other benefits due her under the terms…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Trust Co. v. Catawba Sales & Processing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Canestrino v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Skinner v. Gaither Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Thomasville Chair Co. v. United Furniture Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- James v. Sartin Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Moore v. ADAMS ELECTRIC COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Hammond v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Bigger v. Vista Sales & Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.