Legal Opinion

Tarpley v. . Arnold

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Tbe parties in briefs filed in tbis Court appear to be in agreement that tbe method of arbitration adopted by them in this case is in accordance with procedure at common law, and not with that prescribed in tbe uniform arbitration act, G. S., 1-544, et seq. Hence, tbe motion of plaintiff to strike tbe report of the_ arbitrator must be considered in tbe light of pertinent common law.

Plaintiff contends tbat, by bis acceding to tbe request of tbe arbitrator to be relieved of making a final decision, tbe agreement to arbitrate was revoked, and tbat thereafter the arbitrator bad no authority to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Carpenter v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Tyson v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between Gantt & Felipe Y Carlos Hurtado & Cia., Ltda.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Skinner v. Gaither Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Brown v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Brown v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. McDonough Construction Co. of Florida v. HannerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API