Murphy v. Continental Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*456The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is an action on an insurance policy issued under the workmen’s compensation law. The employer is not a party defendant. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, and he has appealed.
Briefly, the petition alleges that in January, 1929, plaintiff was a laborer in the employ of W. O. Cook, doing business as the Cook Construction Company; that plaintiff and his employer were operating under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act; that the defendant herein, the Continental Casualty Company, was the employer’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Robertson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Murphy v. W. O. Cook Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Walker v. Kansas Gasoline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Iott v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- S.H. Kress Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Yocum v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Davidson v. Hobart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.