Legal Opinion

Iott v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1930No. 28,865PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The appeal in this case is from the decision of the trial court overruling the demurrer of defendant to the petition.

*651The action was brought by the dependents of a deceased workman against the defendant casualty company on a written contract known as a workmen’s compensation and employers’ liability policy issued by the casualty company to Mosby-Mack Motor Company, for whom the deceased was working at the time of his accidental death. The policy with its conditions, declarations and classifications was attached to the petition as an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Iott v. MosbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. S. R. Zagst & Co. v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  4. Travelers Insurance v. RooneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Samson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. WhittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. DuesenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API