Legal Opinion

Watson v. City of Alameda

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14885PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Employees of defendant City of Alameda, acting under orders of the chief of police, were engaged in marking pedestrian crossing lanes at the intersection of Park Street and Santa Clara Avenue, in the business district of said city. Eight-inch lines were painted in bright orange, establishing lanes nine feet wide. Having finished one side, the workmen proceeded to the other, leaving the wet, painted lanes without barricade or warning sign. Plaintiff, while crossing the street, stepped on the wet paint, slipped and fell, sustaining serious…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Dawson v. Tulare Union High SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Kaufman v. TomichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Crone v. City of El CajonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Laurenzi v. VranizanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API