Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Brechtel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1913No. Docket No. 39PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Ejectment by John C. Arnold against John J. Brechtel. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This is an action in ejectment which was tried before the court, without a jury, who made written findings of fact and of law as follows:

“Findings of Fact.
“(1) The government survey, as entered in the plat book, shows that section 8, town 13 north, range 5 east, is a fractional section due to the convergence of the Souwesconning creek, and the Saginaw river. The lots in said section, upon the westerly side of the said Souwesconning creek, are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, and those of the easterly side, lying between the said creek and Saginaw river, are numbered 5, 6, 7, and 8.
“Plaintiff, John C.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co. v. South Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Pere Marquette Boom Co. v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Butler v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Palmer v. DoddMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Putnam v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Delfelder v. Teton Land & Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Jonkers v. Summit TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Ensign v. FoggMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API