Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Dodd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1887PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Trespass to lands. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This was an action of trespass brought before a justice of the peace.

The declaration is in the usual form, and describes the trespass as having been committed on the south-west fractional quarter of section 23, in township 1 south, range 4 west, in the State of Michigan. The plea was the general issue. On the trial in the circuit court, to which the case had been appealed, the evidence showed that the plaintiff was the owner in fee of the south-west fractional quarter of section 23, by a patent issued by the general government, in which the premises were so described, and the quantity of land…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lessee of William L. Brown and Wife, in Error v. Joseph Clements and Jonathan Hunt, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Wilson v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co. v. South Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Clute v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Putnam v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API