Legal Opinion

Butler v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1891PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Grove, J.) Bill to declare a certain patent void as a cloud upon complainant's title. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Complainant is the owner of lots numbered 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and the N. of lot 13, of Bryan So Ball's subdivision plat of the village of Kent, now part of the city of Grand Bapids. He derives his title from Lucius Lyon and E. P. Hastings, who obtained a patent from the United States November 5, 1833, for the N. fractional half of the S. E. £ of section 25, township 7 N., range 12 W. This land is located on the east bank of Grand river. In this river, and opposite to that portion of section 25 lying east of the river, lay a piece of ground now known as “Island No. 5," and containing the land here…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. The People v. . the Canal AppraisersNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. McManus v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  5. Braddock Jones, in Error v. James G. SoulardSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bourgeois v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. SilberwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McKee v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. McMorran Milling Co. v. C. H. Little Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API