Legal Opinion
Ensign v. Fogg
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1913No. Docket No. 15PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Charles B. Ensign against Frank M. Fogg on a promissory note.- From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This action originated in justice's court, and was brought upon a promissory note signed by the defendant, which note is in the words and figures following:
May
“Leslie, Mich., April 14, 1909.
“One year after date I promise to pay to the order of W. S. Hunter, Jr. ($220.00), two hundred twenty dollars, at the office of People’s Bank of Leslie, Mich., value received, with interest at five per cent, per *319annum from maturity until paid, and attorney’s fees, if not paid at maturity.
“Address, Leslie Mich.
“R. R.- No. 4.
“Due 5 — 14—-10.
“F. M. Fogg.”
On the back of the note appear the indorsements, “W. S.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sirrine v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Anderson v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- People v. JohrMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Polhemus v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Munroe v. EastmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Case v. McKinnisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Bank of Conway v. StaryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- J. B. Colt Co. v. CousinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- McCann v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Bank of Sutton v. SkidmoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.