State v. Kinsella
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Billy Joe Kinsella appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury’s verdict finding him guilty of sexual assault and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Kinsella argues the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict of guilty and asserts the jury’s verdict is against the weight of the evidence. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On July 20, 2009, the State charged Kinsella with one count of sexual assault, a class C felony, in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-07, alleging Kinsella sexually assaulted his stepdaughter, S.B. A two-day trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. KloseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. NakvindaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. TrueloveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. McCallieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.