Legal Opinion

State v. Cain

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2011No. 20110010PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dickey Joseph Cain appeals the district court’s criminal judgment and finding of habitual offender status entered after a jury convicted him of conspiracy to commit aggravated assault. Cain argues the district court erred by (1) denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the State failed to introduce sufficient evidence of the agreement required to establish a conspiracy, (2) finding he was a habitual offender based on certified copies of prior convictions at the same proceeding as the sentencing hearing, (3) denying his pretrial motion to dismiss due to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. United States v. Gloria Zafiro, Jose Martinez, Salvador Garcia, and Alfonso SotoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. State v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. KloseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. DensonIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Dieterle v. DieterleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. KalmioNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API