Legal Opinion
State v. Bertram
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 2006No. 20050035, 20050036, 20050037PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Randy Bertram (“Randy”) appeals from a district court judgment entered upon jury verdicts finding him guilty of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order, criminal trespass, and contact by bodily fluids. We affirm the convictions.
I
[¶ 2] On January 16, 2004, Joan Bertram (“Joan”) and Randy were divorced by a default divorce decree that awarded Joan the parties’ residence. On January 29, 2004, Joan obtained a temporary disorderly conduct restraining order against Randy, and the Williams County Sheriffs Department served that order on him. The order prohibited…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. DemaraisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. NakvindaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. SchmidkunzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.