City of Nampa v. Kibler
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.
In this cause a declaratory judgment was sought by respondent, City of Nampa, and its officials, authorizing them to pay, out of the public moneys of the city, certain claims incurred by Willard Harris and B. P. MacArthur, city police officers, for attorney’s fees, together with fees for witnesses, and other costs incurred, in defending the cases of Cornell v. Harris, 60 Ida. 87, and Cornell v. MacArthur, which was dismissed in the trial court.
The cause was tried to the court without a jury. Among the exhibits introduced in the case were the following: Exhibit 21, Ordinance No. 524, passed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clayton v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Walton v. ParsonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Eldridge v. Black Canyon Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Cornell v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Miller v. Hastings BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of St. Francois v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Lively v. City of BlackfootIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Waigand v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- Opinion No. 53-77 (1977), Missouri Attorney General Reports1977