Legal Opinion

Waigand v. City of Nampa

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1943No. 7073PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.

Plaintiff and appellant was the duly elected, qualified and acting mayor of the City of Nampa. July 23, 1941, during his absence from the city, the city council held a meeting and appointed Wallace H. Wakefield chief of police. Wakefield thereupon entered upon the discharge of the duties of the office to which he was so appointed. The mayor refused to approve the appointment and subsequently also refused to sign salary warrants issued to Wakefield, particularly for the month of July, 1941. Thereupon the city council again met and adopted the following motion:

“It was moved by Keim and seconded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clayton v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Barnert v. Mayor of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
  3. City of Louisville v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  4. Wiley v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Smedley v. City of Grand HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lomelo v. City of SunriseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Krahmer v. McClaffertySuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
  3. City of Hialeah v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Town of Cumberland v. Cumberland Plan BdSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API