Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Harris

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1939No. 6561PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIYENS, J. —

June 26, 1937 about 9 P. M. appellants, husband and wife, accompanied by their 16 year-old grandson and Mrs. Cornell’s mother, double parked their automobile in Nampa on Main Street between 11th and 12th.

While Mr. Cornell was in an adjacent butcher shop McArthur, a policeman of the city of Nampa, approached the car, and, Avhile there is a sharp conflict in the evidence as to just what occurred, the substance of the folloAving is a fair narrative leading up to the main and crucial event: Mr. McArthur wanted the automobile moved as it was obstructing traffic; the grandson, at Mrs.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. GalpernNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Noble v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Cain v. SkillinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Dollar Savings & Trust Co. v. PicardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Tipsword v. PotterIdaho Supreme Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rich v. BairIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Smith v. LottIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Beus v. City of Soda SpringsIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. City of Nampa v. KiblerIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State v. HallenbeckIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API