State v. Ferebee
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Defendant’s purported assignments of error are not based on exceptions duly noted in apt time and are ineffectual. 1 Strong, N. C. Index, Appeal and Error § 19.
Defendant’s brief asserts the “Question Involved” is: “Did the Court, in refusing to continué this case to a subsequent term, deprive the defendant of constitutional rights to which he was entitled?”
“Granting or denying a motion for continuance rests in the sound discretion of the presiding judge and his decision will not be disturbed on appeal, except for abuse of discretion or a showing the defendant has been deprived of a fair…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . HartsfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- State v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. . DrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- State v. . CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.