Legal Opinion

State v. . Dry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1910PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from E. B. Jones, J., at January Term, 1910, of Ca-BARRITS. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court. •

1Opinion of the CourtCiARK, C. J.

Tbe prisoners were on trial for murder. During tbe taking of tbe evidence tbe judge learned for tbe first time that during tbe selection of tbe jury one of tbe prisoners (Blake) bad left tbe courtroom and gone into an adjoining room, for a short while, to speak with tbe coroner, without tbe knowledge of tbe court, solicitor, or bis. counsel, though tbe court bad in fact given permission for said Blake to go into tbe adjoining room! with tbe coroner, not knowing that, be was one of' tbe parties on trial. Upon learning tbe above facts, tbe court asked tbe counsel for the prisoners if they…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. . WhitsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. State v. . WisemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  3. State v. Tyson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . McGimseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API