Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1979No. 21PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

In Chapter 168 of the General Statutes the General Assembly has granted a number of rights to “handicapped persons.” Among these rights is the right to employment. This right is granted by G.S. 168-6, which provides, in pertinent part, that “handicapped persons shall be employed ... on the same terms and conditions as the ablebodied, unless it is shown that the particular disability impairs the performance of the work involved.” (Emphasis added.)

Plaintiff alleges that defendant violated G.S. 168-6 by refusing to hire him upon discovering that plaintiff suffered from a case of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Jolly v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. StovallWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HargettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API